Former NLRB Chairman Discusses Latest Proposed Big Labor Bailout

Yesterday, we wrote:

The National Relations Board (NLRB), now completely filled with five appointees, is wasting no time rolling out its Big Labor-friendly agenda.  Board Chair Mark Pearce is moving forward with a series of regulations that will make it much easier for union bosses to win elections in the workplace.

One controversial proposal mandates businesses surrender employee phone and email contact information to campaigning union heads.

Former NLRB Chairman Peter Schaumber discusses this on Fox News:

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

House Committee To Hold Hearing On NLRB Recess Appointments

The House Education and Workforce Committee is scheduled to hold a hearing on President Obama’s controversial recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board.  Committee Chair Rep. John Kline (R-MN) seeks to gather more information on how the Obama Administration determined the recent appointments were legitimate, especially since they were made when the U.S. Senate was convening in pro-forma sessions.

WHAT: “The NLRB Recess Appointments: Implications for America’s Workers and Employers.”
WHO: House Education and Workforce Committee
WHEN: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 at 10:00am
WHERE: U.S. House of Representatives Rayburn House Office Building, Room 2175

“In his State of the Union address, the president pledged to do everything he can to help businesses succeed,” said Chairman Kline in a statement. “Yet he has stood by while an activist NLRB wreaks havoc on the rights of workers and employers.”

“In fact, the controversial recess appointments to the board are the president’s stamp of approval on the board’s job destroying agenda, and every future action by the board will be tainted by the questions surrounding their legal authority,” added the Chair. “The committee has a responsibility to closely examine the consequences of the president’s actions.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Recess Appointments Settled In, NLRB Does Big Labor’s Bidding

The National Relations Board (NLRB), now completely filled with five appointees, is wasting no time rolling out its Big Labor-friendly agenda.  Board Chair Mark Pearce is moving forward with a series of regulations that will make it much easier for union bosses to win elections in the workplace.

One controversial proposal mandates businesses surrender employee phone and email contact information to campaigning union heads.

Said Pearce: “We keep our eye on the prize. Our goal is to create a set of rules that eliminate a lot of waste of time, energy and money for the taxpayers.”

The prize, it seems, is to ensure Big Labor is getting the agenda it wants by eliminating fairness in the workplace.  Pearce appears unfazed by strong objections from the business community to these new rules, and suggests the NLRB will push them through irrespective of the opposition and due process.

When asked about President Obama’s unprecedented appointment of NLRB nominees while the Senate was out of recess, Pearce was glib. “We presume the constitutionality of the president’s appointments and we go forward based on that understanding.”

Despite that, the Workforce Fairness Institute continues moving forward with its current online petition on the White House’s “We the People” website demanding the President rescind his recess appointments to the NLRB immediately.

Posted in Big Labor Bailout, Big Labor Bosses, NLRB | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Get active and tweet all week about recess appointments during the State of the Union

Tonight is President Obama’s last State of the Union before the election.  Will he highlight all of his handouts to Big Labor over the last year?

What he should be addressing are his illegitimate and unconstitutional recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board.  More than likely he’ll either skim over it or not address it at all.

But, concerned citizens and advocates have an opportunity to talk directly to the White House and put pressure on them about this egregious violation of democracy.  Here’s what you can do:

  • Right after the SOTU, starting at 10pm ET, senior administration officials will be answering questions via Twitter.  Hashtag your questions about workplace fairness and those recess appointments with #WHChat and #SOTU.
  • The remainder of the week, Obama Administration officials are facilitating a wide range of LIVE tweet-ups using #WHChat to answer questions.  Follow the conversation through @WHLive on Twitter.
  • On Thursday, January 26th, at 4pm ET, Christine Koronides, Senior Advisor for Economic Policy, National Economic Council, will be answering questions about Small Business via Twitter
  • Also on Thursday, January 26th at 4pm ET, Jason Furman, Principal Deputy Director of the National Economic Council will discuss administration economic policy and at 5pm its Portia Wu, Senior Policy Advisor for Mobility & Opportunity Policy to discuss Job Opportunities
  • And on Monday, January 30th: a LIVE State of the Union Interview with President Obama who will answer questions that have been submitted by Americans from across the country via YouTube. This event happens through Google+ Hangout. You can submit questions now through January 28th at youtube.com/whitehouse.

Let’s see if we can get Obama to address the recess appointments and spread the word about our petition.  If you haven’t already, sign our petition to rescind the recess appointments TODAY!

Posted in Big Labor Bailout, Big Labor Bosses, NLRB, Politics, Unions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Obama Labor Board Recess Appointee: “Clear Conflict Of Interest”

The Workforce Fairness Institute (WFI) today released the following statement in response to news reports that President Obama’s recess appointee Richard Griffin to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) “will continue to receive payments from a major labor union during his time on the board.”

“President Obama’s recess appointment of Richard Griffin to the National Labor Relations Board was clearly a giveaway to Big Labor and outside the authority provided in the Constitution.  In addition, the recess appointment was made just days after the nomination was announced highlighting the extreme nature of the payback,” said Fred Wszolek, spokesperson for the Workforce Fairness Institute (WFI).  “We are now learning that Richard Griffin will receive payments from labor pension plans therefore calling into question any impartiality on his part, which was highly dubious to begin with considering his track record of working against employees and in favor of union bosses.  Any decisions Griffin would make on the Obama labor board would undoubtedly force workers into unions and pad Big Labor’s bottom line, and in turn, affect the value of his own pension.  This is simply unacceptable and intolerable.  Griffin has a clear conflict of interest and this development explains why President Obama did not want him to go through the proper and required nomination process.  Congress must act immediately to address this matter.”

BACKGROUND

“NLRB Appointee Will Continue To Receive Payments From Union”:

“Financial disclosure documents filed by two of President Obama’s illegal appointments to the National Labor Relations Board show that one will continue to receive payments from a major labor union during his time on the board.  Richard Griffin, the former general counsel for the International Union of Operating Engineers, will receive regular payments under two different IUOE pension plans.  The payment amounts are not listed on the disclosure form.  He will also receive a single lump sum payment equal to three weeks of salary (one week for each of the three years since he enrolled in the plan).  Griffin’s annual salary as the IUOE’s general counsel was $376,778, according to the disclosure form.” (Lachlan Markay, “NLRB Appointee Will Continue To Receive Payments From Union,” The Heritage Foundation, 1/23/12)

Posted in Big Labor Bosses, NLRB, Unions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

FAA Agreement Defends Worker Rights

The Workforce Fairness Institute (WFI) today released the following statement in response to news reports that Congressional leaders have reached an agreement on Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) legislation:

“The agreement reached by Congressional leadership protects the rights of workers in the airline and railroad industries and balances the scales in workplace elections.  While we continue to believe the National Mediation Board (NMB) ruling upending nearly a century of precedent was an extraordinary form of payback to Big Labor bosses, the legislative branch has met its constitutional obligation to serve as a check on the executive,” said Fred Wszolek, spokesperson for the Workforce Fairness Institute (WFI).  “The deal as reported will appropriately require 50 percent of workers in a company to support efforts to organize before a union election can be held as opposed to the current 35 percent.  Another noteworthy provision ensures run-off elections are between the top two recipients of worker votes ending the practice of allowing a union with less support than the no-union vote to remain on the ballot.  Lastly, the NMB will now be required to conduct public hearings when engaging in significant rulemaking.  At the end of the day, this is a decisive victory for workers and significant defeat for union bosses who sought to use an Obama regulatory agency to stack the deck against employees and employers.”

BACKGROUND:

“Congressional Leaders Compromise On Unionizing Of Airline Workers, Clearing Way For FAA Bill”:

“Lawmakers reached a compromise Friday that toughens the rules airline and railroad workers must follow to hold union elections, boosting prospects for passage of a long-term funding plan for the Federal Aviation Administration, congressional aides said.  The compromise – negotiated primarily between Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio – was the most contentious of a handful of unresolved issues holding up passage of an FAA bill.  The issue was partly responsible for a standoff between Senate Democrats and House Republicans last summer that led to a two-week partial shutdown of the FAA, including the furlough of nearly 4,000 workers.  The Republican-controlled House was insisting the FAA bill include language to overturn a 2010 National Mediation Board ruling allowing airline workers to form a union by a simple majority of those who voted in the election.  Prior to that, workers who didn’t vote were treated as ‘no’ votes, making it possible for a union to lose an election even with the support of a majority of those voting.  With Democrats adamant that the board’s ruling must stand, Republicans dropped their demand in exchange for concessions that are likely to be less troublesome to labor.  The compromise reached Friday would require that 50 percent of a company’s workers indicate support for holding an election to form a new union before a vote can be held.  Currently, the threshold is a 35 percent show of support – usually by workers signing cards – in order to hold an election … Another change would allow for a run-off election between the top two vote-getters, even if one of those two is the option of ‘no union.’  And, the mediation board would have to hold a public hearing before making a significant rule change.  The board oversees only labor matters in the airline and railroad industries.” (Joan Lowy, “Congressional Leaders Compromise On Unionizing Of Airline Workers, Clearing Way For FAA Bill,” The Associated Press, 1/20/12)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Depth Of Obama Labor Board Job-Killing Dishonesty On “Micro-Units” Revealed

By Fred Wszolek

As President Obama’s National Labor Relations Board continues on its crash course to kill jobs and close American businesses, the depths of their dishonesty are being revealed.  In arriving at its conclusion in Specialty Healthcare, a decision which radically alters how collective bargaining units are defined, the regulatory agency stated they “did not create new criteria for determining appropriate bargaining units outside of health care facilities.”  At the time, we knew the statement was patently false and it has just been demonstrated in the NLRB’s decision reached on the eve of labor radical Craig Becker’s exit that states rental service agents constitute an appropriate unit and does not include any other employees working in the same location.  By allowing multiple mini-units to be formed in every industry therefore allowing union bosses to gain a foothold into businesses, labor relations costs related to bargaining will skyrocket and threaten the solvency of employers and produce greater jobs losses.  In its most recent decision, the Obama labor board is once again demonstrating they will say and do anything to payback labor bosses, and in the process destroy the ability of workers and small businesses to lead our country toward economic recovery and growth.

BACKGROUND:

DTG Operations Inc., 357 N.L.R.B. No. 175, 12/30/11 (Accessed, 1/20/12)

Posted in Big Labor Bailout, Big Labor Bosses, NLRB, Unions | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

WFI Applauds Executive Appointment Reform Act Introduction

By Fred Wszolek

We believe that President Obama’s recess appointments of Richard Griffin and Sharon Block to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) were unconstitutional and a gross overreach by the executive branch that serves as nothing more than payback to Big Labor bosses who are bankrolling his re-election campaign. Therefore, we believe it is pivotal that the legislative branch assert its authority under the Constitution by passing legislation that ensures the system of checks and balances remains intact. Legislation introduced by Representative Jeff Landry titled the Executive Appointment Reform Act (EARA) deserves the serious consideration of Members of Congress as it states “payment for services may not be made to an individual appointed during a recess of the Senate to fill a vacancy in an existing office, if the vacancy existed while the Senate was in session and was by law required to be filled by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, and for other purposes.” On its own, this is noteworthy legislative language, but particular so since the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) used the Pay Act in defense of its actions writing it “sets out the circumstances in which a recess appointee may be paid a salary from the Treasury.” Clearly, Congress has the power of the purse strings and should exercise it. If these non-recess appointees want to work to advance policies that kill American jobs, at the very least, taxpayer dollars should not be expended in paying their wages unless they are confirmed by the U.S. Senate as clearly intended by our nation’s founding fathers and completely disregarded by the current administration.

BACKGROUND:

“To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that payment for services may not be made to an individual appointed during a recess of the Senate to fill a vacancy in an existing office, if the vacancy existed while the Senate was in session and was by law required to be filled by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, and for other purposes.” (Executive Appointment Reform Act, Accessed 1/16/11)

“There is significant (albeit not uniform) evidence that the Executive Branch’s view that recess appointments during intrasession recesses are constitutional has been accepted by Congress and its officers. Most relevant, in our view, is the Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5503 (2006), which sets out the circumstances in which a recess appointee may be paid a salary from the Treasury. The Attorney General has long taken the position that the Act constitutes congressional acquiescence to recess appointments under circumstances where the Act would permit payment.” (Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel, Accessed 1/16/11)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment